What is a Non-molestation Order?
(1) In this Part a “non-molestation order” means an order containing either or both of the following provisions —
(a) provision prohibiting a person ( “the respondent”) from molesting another person who is associated with the respondent;
(b) provision prohibiting the respondent from molesting a relevant child.
(2) The court may make a non-molestation order —
(a) if an application for the order has been made (whether in other family proceedings or without any other family proceedings being instituted) by a person who is associated with the respondent; or
(b) if in any family proceedings to which the respondent is a party the court considers that the order should be made for the benefit of any other party to the proceedings or any relevant child even though no such application has been made.
Application without notice
s45 Ex parte (without notice) orders.
(1) The court may, in any case where it considers that it is just and convenient to do so, make an occupation order or a non-molestation order even though the respondent has not been given such notice of the proceedings as would otherwise be required by rules of court.
(2) In determining whether to exercise its powers under subsection (1), the court shall have regard to all the circumstances including —
(a) any risk of significant harm to the applicant or a relevant child, attributable to conduct of the respondent, if the order is not made immediately;
(b) whether it is likely that the applicant will be deterred or prevented from pursuing the application if an order is not made immediately; and
(c) whether there is reason to believe that the respondent is aware of the proceedings but is deliberately evading service and that the applicant or a relevant child will be seriously prejudiced by the delay in effecting substituted service.
(3) If the court makes an order by virtue of subsection (1) it must afford the respondent an opportunity to make representations relating to the order as soon as just and convenient at a full hearing.
What is the penalty for breach?
(1) A person who without reasonable excuse does anything that he is prohibited from doing by a non-molestation order is guilty of an offence.
(2) In the case of a non-molestation order made by virtue of section 45(1), a person can be guilty of an offence under this section only in respect of conduct engaged in at a time when he was aware of the existence of the order.
(3) Where a person is convicted of an offence under this section in respect of any conduct, that conduct is not punishable as a contempt of court.
(4) A person cannot be convicted of an offence under this section in respect of any conduct which has been punished as a contempt of court.
(5) A person guilty of an offence under this section is liable —
(a) on conviction on indictment, to imprisonment for a term not exceeding five years, or a fine, or both;
(b) on summary conviction, to imprisonment for a term not exceeding 12 months, or a fine not exceeding the statutory maximum, or both.
If, as Respondent you fail to attend the 'return hearing' of your case any order already made will remain until the date stated and will be enforceable as a criminal offence, punishable by up to five years in prison.
If a without notice order has not been made an order limitinformation your behaviour will likely be made in your a absence, often in the first instance for one year.
As part of their application for an order the Applicant will outline the behaviour they allege justifies injunctive relief. As a Respondent if you accept, for whatever reason your behaviour was innappropriate you can accept the allegations made are true and as such agree to the continuation of the order.
An alternative option available is to attend Court and accept the continuation of the order on the basis that the allegations made by the Applicant are denied but that as there is no intention to behave as alleged there is no prejudice to there being an order. In this instance the order would remain in force and alleged breaches will remain subject to investigation by the police as a criminal offence until expiration of the order.
The preferred option would be to attend Court and offer an undertaking.
An undertaking is a promise to the Court to abide by prohibitions as outlined in the order and is made without making any admissions as to the allegations of the Applicant but would need to be accepted both by the Court and the Applicant.
An undertaking would replace the order but unlike the order is not inherently enforceable by the police, as such any alleged breach will need to be brought before the Court who, if satisfied beyond reasonable doubt that there has been a breach, may give a custodial sentence of up to two years and/or a fine.
Contest the allegations and seek the listing of the matter for a full contested hearing and obtain directions for the filing of evidence, potentially including disclosure from the police.
Avenue HQ, 10-12 East Parade,
Leeds, LS1 2BH
COMPLAINTS